industry for recurring crewed lunar landing services. NASA said on Thursday "there will be forthcoming opportunities for companies to partner with NASA in establishing a long-term human presence at the Moon under the agency’s Artemis program, including a call in 2022 to U.S. NASA had sought proposals for a spacecraft that would carry astronauts to the lunar surface under its Artemis program to return humans to the moon for the first time since 1972. SpaceX, headed by Tesla Inc Chief Executive Musk, joined the proceedings as an intervener shortly after the lawsuit was filed. In April 2021, NASA announced that it had selected SpaceXs next-generation Starship vehicle as the first crewed lunar lander. Government Accountability Office (GAO) in July sided with the NASA over its decision to pick a single lunar lander provider, rejecting Blue Origin's protest. NASA has booked another crewed trip to the lunar surface with SpaceX. 1, part of an agreement among the parties to expedite the litigation schedule, which culminated in Thursday's ruling. NASA halted work on the lunar lander contract through Nov. NASA said on Thursday "it will resume work with SpaceX" on the lunar lander contract "as soon as possible." The space agency added it "continues working with multiple American companies to bolster competition and commercial readiness for crewed transportation to the lunar surface." "Not the decision we wanted, but we respect the court’s judgment, and wish full success for NASA and SpaceX on the contract," Bezos wrote on Twitter. Thats pretty much the lunar lander use case minus the human-rated compartment - which has been demonstrated a few times now. The judge's opinion explaining his reasoning was sealed, as were many other documents in the case, pending a meeting this month on proposed redactions.īlue Origin, created by Inc founder Bezos, expressed disappointment. Court of Federal Claims in Washington granted the government's motion to dismiss the suit filed on Aug. As NASA makes strides to return humans to the lunar surface under Artemis, the agency announced plans Wednesday to create additional opportunities for commercial companies to develop an astronaut Moon lander. government over NASA's decision to award a $2.9 billion lunar lander contract to rival billionaire Elon Musk's SpaceX. "The sad thing is that even if Santa Claus suddenly made their hardware real for free, the first thing you'd want to do is cancel it," Musk wrote in a tweet.(Reuters) -A federal judge on Thursday rejected a lawsuit by Jeff Bezos' space company Blue Origin against the U.S. Musk, in response to Blue Origin's infographic, gave his view of Bezos' company and its criticism. In a series of comparative infographics, Blue Origin has emphasized the "unprecedented number of technologies, developments, and operations that have never been done before for Starship to land on the Moon."īlue Origin last week released an infographic that added that Starship is "a launch vehicle that has never flown to orbit and is still being designed." The company's court filing on Monday comes as Blue Origin has stepped up a public relations offensive against NASA using SpaceX's next-generation Starship to land astronauts on the moon. Before the April contract award, NASA had handed out nearly $1 billion in concept development contracts – with SpaceX receiving $135 million, Dynetics $253 million, and Blue Origin receiving $579 million. Personal Loans for 670 Credit Score or Lowerīlue Origin has not let up on its fight to win a contract under NASA's HLS program, one of the final key pieces of the agency's plan to return U.S. Personal Loans for 580 Credit Score or Lower Best Debt Consolidation Loans for Bad Credit
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |